guglden.blogg.se

1. LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 INSTALL
2. LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 UPDATE
3. LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 CODE
4. LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 WINDOWS

19:44:29,723 2980 - Configuration: CommandName='install'|ĬacheLocation='C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey'|ĬommandExecutionTimeoutSeconds='2700'|WebRequestTimeoutSeconds='30'| NOTE: Hiding sensitive configuration data! Please double and tripleĬheck to be sure no sensitive data is shown, especially if copying 19:44:29,723 2980 - The source 'c:\cached-packages ' evaluated to a 'normal' source type 2 success(es), 0 warning(s), and 0 error(s).

LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 WINDOWS

19:44:29,708 2980 - Pending Windows Package Installer SysWow64 = Checked 19:44:29,708 2980 - Pending Windows Package Installer = Checked 19:44:29,708 2980 - Pending File Rename Operations = Ignored

LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 UPDATE

19:44:29,708 2980 - Pending Windows Auto Update = Checked 19:44:29,708 2980 - Pending Component Based Servicing = Checked

LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 CODE

19:44:29,692 2980 - Package Exit Code / Exit On Reboot = Checked 19:44:29,692 2980 - Global Configuration Validation Checks: 19:44:29,583 2980 - Removing all pending packages that should not be considered installed. 19:44:29,567 2980 - Sending message 'PreRunMessage' out if there are subscribers. 19:44:29,567 2980 - RemovePendingPackagesTask is now ready and waiting for PreRunMessage.

LOCALE EMULATOR 2.2.1.0 ERROR C0000142 INSTALL

19:44:29,520 2980 - Received arguments: install locale-emulator -version 2.5.0.1 -fdvy -execution-timeout=2700 -allow-downgrade 19:44:29,520 2980 - Command line: "C:\ProgramData\chocolatey\choco.exe" install locale-emulator -version 2.5.0.1 -fdvy -execution-timeout=2700 -allow-downgrade If you don't like using Stephen's library, you can also check the other solutions offered here (which I haven't tested yet).19:44:29,208 2980 - XmlConfiguration is now operational Net, so you might find the security wrapper classes here useful The security descriptors for the Window Station and Desktop must be adjusted to give AllAccess permission to the user the process is being launched under. The reason for this is that on initialization, before any application code is run, all processes are attached to a Window Station and all threads are attached to a Desktop but the user you are launching under does not have permission to access the Window Station and Desktop in which your process is being launched, ergo it can't initialize. There may be some minor variation in this but basically it is saying that your application could not initialize. There should be an entry for Application Error that says that your process was the faulting application, either user32.dll or kernel32.dll was the faulting module and the exception was: 0xC0000142. Oops again, where is the process? Check the event log (or you may have received an Application Error pop-up). Stephen Martin has given an explanation of what's going on here, so if you are experiencing the issue described in the original question, the following blog post may be of interest to you: coffee, followed by strong liquor, then again coffee.which makes me assume that the user change leads to the problem.Īfter having read upon Error Code 142, here's what I've tried so far: X - The service gets no error, but processes terminate right away.The following table is supposed to indicate what happens in which account constellation. Secondary logon service is enabled (just in case, should that matter).Both accounts have the right to log on as a service.Both accounts are in the Local Admin group.The service is being run under the first one and starts the processes using the second one. Now, I have two accounts - for simplicity's sake, say A and B. StartInfo.Password = passwordSecureString StartInfo.WorkingDirectory = instancePath The code used by the service to do so is the following: ProcessStartInfo startInfo = new ProcessStartInfo(executablePath, commandlineArgs) I have a situation occuring when launching Processes from a Windows service _